• Home
  • Blogosphere
    • Alumni
    • Backing the Pack
    • CarolinaSucks!
    • PackInsider
    • Pulse Of The Pack
    • PackPride
    • Technician
  • Resources
    • Feedback
    • Disclaimers/Legal/Et Al
    • Sitemaps
      • Post Sitemap
      • Category Sitemap
      • Tag Sitemap
  • Socialize
    • “FOLLOW” US! (Twitter)
    • “LIKE” US! (Facebook)
    • Forums (Pack Insider)

Best Valued Universities: NC State in “better place”, UNC not so much

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : January 14, 2013
0

Category: Academics, Administration, Blog Stuff, Non-Athletic, Slider

Tags:Best Valued, Kiplinger's, NC State, Oblinger, UNC

logo[2]It’s not always best to be #1.  For example, you could be #1 at cheating.  You could be #1 at any number of deplorable personality traits.  You could be #1 in ignorance and undeserved arrogance.  While all of these apply to Carolina more-so than NC State, today we’re talking about “Value”.  It’s not that long ago that NC State was riding atop the “Best Values in Public Colleges” list released annually by Kiplinger’s.  While some out there, including the University itself, boasted their good value, many mis-perceptions about “value” persisted.

NC STATE’S VALUE = CHEAP … UNC’S VALUE = “SMART CONSUMER CHOICE”

My favorite, and the most ironic, perception is that ”value” equates “cheap”.  As anyone involved in engineering requirements or government acquisitions will tell you “inexpensive” and “cheap” are completely and utterly different words. “Inexpensive” is the difference between a MacBook Pro and almost any other high-powered PC laptop; it costs less, but the quality and performance is still there.  “Cheap” is the difference between a MacBook Pro and one of those made-in-China deals with the knock off branding that you find for $100 on eBay.  When NC State listed atop the “Best Valued” in the country, I was still attending NC State and logged into Facebook to see my news feed blowing up.  Anyone and everyone I graduated high school with who had moved on to attend UNC was blasting NC State for being “cheap”.  Oh sweet irony, now only years later we find Carolina ranked #1 in the nation as the very best valued public college… but I bet you won’t find any Carolina students/alums complaining that their alma mater is “cheap”.

DOES GOOD VALUE IMPLY POOR MANAGEMENT?

When NC State ranked at the top of Kiplinger’s annual list, I recall initially wanting to feel proud, but then feeling a little embarrassed for how my University was managed.  You see, NC State was eliminating course sections, cutting back selected building projects, and hoarding any resemblance of a “student life” in the name of budget cuts and dwindling funds.  We also were staring at an embarrassing low endowment relative to other peer institutions.  (Then there was, of course, the scandal with the governor’s wife (Easley), but that’s another story.)  The point is that NC State was not in a good financial place, but yet was considered “high value”.  Does that make any sense?

For a student, or prospective student (or more likely their parents in this day-in-age), a “value” university is a fantastic thing.  It means they are getting the very best for a reasonable price.  For the administration of that university, it means that the “customers” are willing to pay much, much more for the product of education that you offer.  For NC State several years back, it meant that while we didn’t have enough money to fund an extra section of CH101, we had thousands of potential students who could be expected to pay a little more.

I know this isn’t the kind of idea popular with students and I know that parents probably want to throw a shoe at their screens right now in hopes it will shut-down this blog post, but “best valued in the country” is only a good thing if you aren’t facing mounting fiscal challenges and having to sacrifice quality of education and student life in the nation of dwindling budgets.  Maybe everyone over in “the Hill” is perfectly happy with claiming to be the best, but in these economic times when NO ONE is doing a fantastic job, being the “best valued” university sounds an awful lot like being the worst at evaluating your academic product.

PS: NC State comes in at #21 in-state and #25 out-of-state.  As with all things in life, balance is usually the best approach.  With the number of organizational changes Woodson has made at NC State mixed with the drop in our “value” from being the best to being “good”, I think most NC State friends and family can feel much better about the management and administration of NC State’s finances and execution.

Hard Work Isn’t Obsolete

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : October 19, 2012
0

Category: Academics, Slider

Tags:CHASS, College Majors, Engineering, Sociology, What major should I pick?

Working with teenagers is always a hoot.  It starts with the dramatic personal drama that they are convinced with define their love lives for the next 60 years to the algebra project they are freaking out over because they think one bad grade means no college will want them.  What’s not so funny is a teenager struggling to identify what direction they want to head with their education.  There was once a day when if you had any 4 year degree, you were promised a higher-level job.  That soon gave way to the promise that any given 4 year degree would promise you “a” job.  With 53% of new college graduates being out of a job, a 4-year degree doesn’t promise anything in and of itself and what college degree becomes increasingly important.

In a recent article in the Technician, Associate Professor Stephen Greene in political science answers questions from students ranging from personal issues to questions about their academic future.  This article in particular featured a question from a concerned freshmen who had entered college like so many other high school teenagers without knowing what major they wanted to pick.  Obviously the question begins to come down to the age-old struggle between passion and practicality.  This is what Dr. Greene said…

Honestly, in this current job and economic climate I think it would be foolish to not at least strongly consider the employment prospects of one’s chosen major. That said, employment means doing something at least 40 hours/week for many, many years.

He went on to say…

That said, if you choose a more passion-based major, you really need to invest your passion in it because it probably will not be as easy to find a job as if you had a mechanical engineering degree. Don’t take classes because you were told they were easy. Take them because they have a great professor who will challenge you to think and learn in new ways.

Bingo.  The name of the game isn’t convincing everyone that if you aren’t an engineer, you won’t get a job.  In fact, many non-engineering programs at State have specialized career departments that have very good reputations for job placement after completion of a degree (like the College of Textiles).

The one thing that hasn’t changed over the years is the implications of hard work.  When I completed my undergraduate degree I was, shall we say, not necessarily at the top of my class.  That said, I chose a challenging degree program worked like a dog throughout college doing menial manual labor/blue collar jobs and was rewarded with a good job that I have a passion for that pays well and, yes, still requires a boat load of work.  The same is true whether you are a sociology major, a nuclear engineer, or a design major.  Your job prospects are tied to how effectively you work with yourself and with others.

It’s refreshing to see things like this coming from any professor, especially one in CHASS.  No one is going to give you a job simply because you made an A in that really hard class or have a fancy woven piece of paper hanging on the wall.  Luckily, at beloved NC State, the resources, degrees, and personnel are all there to help you achieve.  Don’t waste a good opportunity.

UNC’s Accreditation Violations

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : August 16, 2012
0

Category: Academics, Administration, Athletics, Slider

Tags:Accreditation, African-American Studies, Nyang'oro, SACS, UNC

After yesterday’s article on why UNC’s accreditation should be the next disciplinary step in their descent into collegiate Hell, I began looking into what it took to be accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.  Their published principles can be found on their website.

Here are a few areas where it appears Carolina is violating their obligations for accreditation.  Not too long ago, I even posted an article that advocated for dropping the athletic call-to-arms regarding some of the more athletically-centric super-sleuthing, but there is a bigger-picture problem with UNC.  Read on…

Section 2.7.4

“The institution provides instruction for all course work required for at least one degree program at each level at which it awards degrees. If the institution does not provide instruction for all such course work and (1) makes arrangements for some instruction to be provided by other accredited institutions or entities through contracts or consortia or (2) uses some other alternative approach to meeting this requirement, the alternative approach must be approved by the Commission on Colleges. In both cases, the institution demonstrates that it controls all aspects of its educational program. (See Commission policy “Core Requirement 2.7.4: Documenting an Alternate Approach.”) (Course work for Degrees)

Through Carolina’s apparent knowledge that up to the department staff level in the African-American Studies program it was aware of the treatment Prof Julius Nyang’oro was giving towards student athletes.  Taken from a July 28th article on “Keeping It Heel”…

Let’s clear this up before people who don’t know the full story get carried away with it. The scandal that involved the African-American Department at the University has everything to do with our athletes. However, the athletes have done nothing wrong. The issues in the department created a scandal because of the former professor and chair of the department, Julius Nyang’oro.

I completely agree with the author.  The issue isn’t so much the student-athletes as much as it is the department staff.  The athletes didn’t do anything wrong besides sign up for a pseudo-class that the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill sanctioned and credited for degree completion.  That, however, means that the university sanctioned a course that, according to later reports, it had no control over seeing as how students rarely showed up and Prof Nyang’oro was even absent for.  Therefore, UNC failed to show that it can demonstrate control over all aspects of it’s education program.

Section 3.2.11

“The institution’s chief executive officer has ultimate responsibility for, and exercises appropriate administrative and fiscal control over, the institution’s intercollegiate athletics program. (Control of intercollegiate athletics)”

Chancellor Thorp has done an effective job at making sure that this scandal did not reach up to his office.  The assistant head coach was cut of, the head coach was cut off, the athletic director was cut off, but Chancellor Thorp kept up the “I know nothing!” approach to this entire issue.  Thorp, as the chief executive officer for UNC, has ultimate responsibility for athletics and the problems the athletic department has faced.  The fact that the UNC Board of Governors has done nothing to publicly reprimand or investigate Thorp shows exactly how insulated this institution is trying to keep this academic scandal.  If compliance with SACS accreditation standards is going to be maintained, Thorp must be reprimanded.

In order for Thorp to be reprimanded, the university will actually have to admit fault, first.

Section 3.3.1

“The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of the following areas: (Institutional Effectiveness)

3.3.1.1 educational programs, to include student learning outcomes
3.3.1.2 administrative support services
3.3.1.3 academic and student support services
3.3.1.4 research within its mission, if appropriate
3.3.1.5 community”

 Carolina either (a) failed to note student learning outcomes or (b) noted the student learning outcomes and simply didn’t care.  I honestly don’t believe word would have made it to Chancellor Thorp’s office that students didn’t learn jack-shit and the chancellor simply dismiss it, so I’m going to assume the correct answer is “a”.  By failing to confirm the learning outcomes of the students, UNC did a disservice to the NCAA by spoofing the academic eligibility standards set forth for athletics and they spat in the face of SACS by ignoring their primary educational tasking… to education young minds.

Section 3.4.1

“The institution demonstrates that each educational program for which academic credit is awarded is approved by the faculty and the administration. (Academic program approval)”

According to this requirement, if UNC was compliant, that would me that the faculty and administration would of been completely knowledgeable of Prof. Nyang’oro’s classes and what type of workload they required.  As stated before, it’s hard to imagine an institution where one of these courses would earnestly be reported to the administration and no one whistle-blow what is going on (or that no one would have come forward in the last 2 years for media attention).  Therefore, one has to assume that reporting of the various African-American studies courses was not being performed or, at the very least, that UNC failed to “demonstrate” that each program was approved.

I would love to see the official approval for a course whose administrative functions include not having a professor present for large periods of time.

Section 3.7.2

“The institution regularly evaluates the effectiveness of each faculty member in accord with published criteria, regardless of contractual or tenured status. (Faculty evaluation)”

Prof Nyang’oro had taught at UNC as a visiting professor since the mid-1980s and was hired as a full time professor in 1990, being hired at chairman of the African-American Studies department in 1992.  From 1992-2011 when he was released, during none of his “regular evaluations” did UNC point him out as someone giving out grades to athletes.  UNC’s violation is either in not adequately evaluating Nyang’oro’s department or in failing to evaluate him at all.

Section 1.1

“The institution operates with integrity in all matters. (Integrity)”

Saved for last, but certainly not least is Section 1.1 which is the catch-all for matters of integrity.  There may be many complimentary words to describe UNC’s handling of their athletic/academic scandal, but “integrity” doesn’t come to mind.  They have promised cooperation with their mouths while simultaneously blocking attempts to get to public records and dragging their feet in fulfilling legal requests for information.  They have rarely admitted any fault throughout the entire NCAA investigative process and have done nothing of substance to look into their own misdeeds and come forth with a plan for fixing what is obviously completely broken.

UNC deserves to have their accreditation revoked or, at the very least, put on warning or some form of suspension (if there is such a thing).  They have shown that, as an institution, they feel they are above the law and the fair standards that everyone at least pretends to play by.

Stop With Sanction Talk; Strip UNC’s Accreditation

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : August 15, 2012
4

Category: Academics, Administration, Athletics, Slider

Tags:Academic Scandal, Accreditation, Barber-Scotia College, Penn State, Sandusky, UNC

Over the past two years, NC State blogs and media outlets have been covering UNC’s academic woes, but this entire time the scope of our athletic discussions have focused on the NCAA and their official proceedings against the Butch Davis football program.  The problem is that this issue is much, much bigger than the football team or even the athletic department.  This is a university wide, top-down academic nightmare.  I would suggest that the NCAA has done their part and whether it was sufficient or not, it’s over.  Law enforcement also got involved when district attorney Jim Woodall requested the SBI get involved.  The next step, and what everyone in the UNC School System should be crying out for, is for the Dept of Ed’s accreditation agents to take a look into whether UNC’s accreditation should be put on notice or even completely withdrawn.

We have two prime use-cases to show how accreditation is used to address issues of accreditation and how they apply directly to UNC.  In their own way, both examples shine a bright light on why Carolina deserves a nasty letter from the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS).

USE-CASE #1: Barber-Scotia College, 2004

 In 2004, the new president of a small HBCU, Dr. Gloria Bromell Tinubu, learned that they had lost their accreditation due to what the SACS deemed was “a failure to comply with SACS Principles and Philosophy of Accreditation (Integrity)”. There was no crime against humanity or massive athletic scandal that gripped the media for months needed.  What Barber-Scotia was guilty of was “awarded degrees to nearly 30 students in the adult program who SACS determined hadn’t fulfilled the proper requirements”.

So that’s the line in the sand.  What it takes for a college to lose it’s accreditation within the same organization that accredits UNC is to award a number of degrees to students who haven’t fulfilled proper requirements.  So the question now becomes this: is Carolina knowingly and willingly awarding degrees and grades to athletes for the sake of NCAA eligibility synonymous with awarding degrees to students who “hadn’t fulfilled the proper requirements” for graduation? If so, and if the SACS is going to act with the same consistency it showed a small black college in Concord, then it seems only just that Carolina would be receiving similar warnings, investigations, and, if warranted, punishments regarding their own accreditation.

USE-CASE #2: Penn State, 2012

Just last week, news broke that Penn State had been put on warning by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, the organization responsible for conferring university accreditation in the region, due to their recent Sandusky scandal.  While their scandal involves a much more egregious moral offense, the rationale for the warning sounds suspiciously applicable to UNC knowingly and complacently having NFL agents as academic advisers and effectively giving away degrees that cost universities money to finance:

“This action has nothing to do with the quality of education our students receive,” Bowen said in a statement posted Monday to the school’s website. “Middle States is focusing on governance, integrity and financial issues related to information in the Freeh report and other items related to our current situation.”

The commission voted August 6 to place the school on warning status. Two days later, it notified Penn State officials that the school’s accreditation was “in jeopardy” based on information contained in former FBI Director Louis Freeh’s report on Penn State’s handling of the sex-abuse allegations against Sandusky and a National Collegiate Athletic Association action against the school. (link)

What we glean from Vice Provost Bowen and from the Freeh report is that their accreditation warning has more to do with their handling of the situation as it does with the crime itself.  When an institution proves that it is incapable of handling the most obvious of offenses within it’s hallowed halls, whether that’s in the locker room or in the lecture hall, it shows that the institution is lacking in basic more fiber required to guide other minds to be educated professionals.  What lesson is this teaching young alumni of the great flagship university?  That as long as you make the right people look good, they’ll let you get away with murder?  That may be a harsh truth in many aspects of life, but for Carolina’s administration to knowingly allow it is criminal and certainly deserving of putting their accreditation on notice.

“BAD PRESS” ISN’T A PUNISHMENT; DENIED FUNDING IS

At the end of the day, all things come down to money.  ESPN flourishes and can dictate scheduling because they control the purse-strings.  Political Super-PACs can control election season dialog because they have the means to influence others.  If you want to truly call for UNC to reform their institution from the inside-out and purge the disingenuous elements from their administration, you are going to have to hit them where it hurts, and I don’t mean taking banners down in the “Dean Dome”.  A university’s accreditation is directly tied to their funding.  If you want UNC to take notice in a way they can’t ignore, start threatening their accreditation.

My hope is that all of the sports blogs, journalists, and pundits take a moment to step back and look at the full scope of what UNC is doing.  It’s better for the entire UNC School System if the “flagship” is actually exemplifying traits that the system expects of all it’s member institutions.  I have little, if any, faith that the UNC School System will investigate and punish UNC on it’s own volition, so what needs to happen is the SACS stepping in and bitch-slapping UNC into a more humble posture.

(Stay tuned tomorrow for a deeper look into UNC’s accreditation and exactly why it should be revoked, suspended, put on warning, or noted with an asterisk!)

NC State Based Company Encourages Student Entrepreneurship

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : August 1, 2012
0

Category: Academics, Industry, Slider

Tags:Centennial Campus, Entrepreneur, Entrepreneur Garage, NC, NC State, Raleigh, Red Hat

Red Hat has been in Raleigh since 2002, moving from Durham to partner up with NC State University.  Since then, it has been a source for industrial connections and real-world study opportunities with a major playing in the open-source computing realm.  Red Hat has since announced that it is moving off campus to the new Progress Energy Center, but that hasn’t stopped them from encouraging other young engineers and scientists from pursuing their own corporate dreams.

A WRAL article recently covered one of Red Hat’s latest side projects, an “Entrepreneurs Garage”.  The garage is a place where students can roll up their sleeves, pick up a soldering iron, and fabricate up whatever their minds can think up.  One student, Sharon Bui, started a business that sells sorority clothing and uses the space to give her an edge in the market…

“Instead of meeting at Panera, I have a professional space to bring in investors and clients,” Bui said

Opportunities like this are one-and-a-million for students and even if their ideas never take flight, they give them valuable skills and a unique experience to set themselves apart from the crowd when they go to apply for their jobs.

If you’re still a student and looking for a leg-up on the competition, cook up an idea and check into the Entrepreneur Garage.  For more information, visit NC State’s Entrepreneurship Initiative website.

The UNC BOGSAAT and the 216 Non-Issue

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : July 24, 2012
3

Category: Academics, Athletics, Slider

Tags:academics, ACC, African-American Studies, athletics, basketball, Butch Davis, Chancellor Holden Thorp, Football, Lee Fowler, Marvin Austin, McAdoo, NCAA, Nyang'oro, sanctions, scandal, Tar Heels, Thorp, UNC

In February 2010, over two years ago, Marvin Austin began tweeting lustful images of lesbian clubs and cupcakes that gave the NC State community plenty to talk about.  How was he getting the funds to take such trips and buy such gifts?  Fast-forward to July.  ESPN has now picked-up the story that the NCAA is snooping around campus.  Fast-forward yet again to August 2010.  News breaks that academics are involved in the UNC sludge surrounding the football team.  Since August 2010, Carolina’s only attempts at addressing any of the allegations made against them, openly, have come from evasive press statements and a somewhat-adequate NCAA-mandated responses to their Notice of Allegations (NoA).  Aside from that, Carolina has maintained a low public profile and done an effective job of admitting to as little guilt as possible, including refusing to push on Butch Davis’ release of “the 216″ phone records. (More on that in a moment…)

I have to admit… it’s impressive.

That was just under 2 years ago.  Since that point, the ACC has taken no action against UNC aside from releasing a public repremand of their actions, and that repremand didn’t even exist under 3 months ago.  The NCAA handed down their sanctions a month prior to that which amounted to a 2 year bowl ban and 15 scholarship reductions.  It also cost the university a total of nearly $500,000 in legal fees since hiring legal counsel in October of 2010.  (This is in addition to the self-imposed fine of $50,000.)  

Since then, we’ve heard the published results of a 9-month study into UNC’s African American Studies department, which resulted in the departures of several academic staff.  Other than the publishing of a report with no impact on Carolina athletics, all the public has heard about has been a series of BOGSAATs.

WHAT IS THE BOGSAAT?

BOGSAAT stands for “Bunch Of Guys Sitting Around A Table”.  It is the mascot of bureaucracy and the champion of non-movement.  It is also a fitting mental image for what is going on in Chapel Hill.  It took 2 years… two whole fucking years… from the first time people started murmuring about wrong-doing in Chapel Hill until the moment that (a) the NCAA handed down penalties, (b) the ACC released anything resembling an opinion on the matter, and  (c) before reports became bored enough after March Madness to actually start asking where the 216 records are.

So what has actually occurred is the UNC Board of Governors sitting around talking about UNC’s African American Studies program, which was uncovered as an academic prong of the scandal in summer of 2011.  What happened as a result?  Nothing.  They sat around and talked for a while and did nothing, not even bothering to take the incident seriously until the actual NCAA scandal had passed.

But wait!  UNC appears to be forming their own BOGSAAT to get to the middle of things!  In 2010, a coalition of professors got together to urge the university to take a more active, and transparent, role during the investigation.  Last Friday is the first time Chancellor Thorp got any organization of professors together to discuss the matter.

“A few people believe that there is not place at this university for intercollegiate athletics.  I don’t believe that that’s a viable option.  There is a place and at Carolina we have to find the right balance.  That’s going to be hard,” said Thorp.  

Thorp told panel members he would welcome any additional reviews that they recommend.

Welcoming recommendations and taking action are two different matters.  Taking action isn’t waiting until the trail is several years cold.  Taking action isn’t refusing to comply with requests for information from the press and NCAA investigators.  Taking action isn’t sitting around while a statistically significant portion of your athletic department rapes any resemblance of a compliance code then takes the field.  When Thorp says he welcomes recommendations, the question is whether UNC will do anything with said “recommendations”.  If UNC’s BOGSAAT is anything like the UNC School System’s (and any other BOGSAAT in the corporate and government world) then the UNC faculties’ recommendations will sit around for discussion until it’s a non-issue.

That brings us to the 216 records.

WHY THE BOGSAAT MAKES THE 216 DEBATE A NON-ISSUE

Recently, another NC State blog posted an article regarding why Butch Davis and his attorney are destined to lose the battle for their 216 phone records.  (Lots of information on the matter can be found on their blog if you aren’t up-to-speed on the issue.)  The hope is that if we have the 216 records, we can link Butch Davis, directly, to improper acts.  Hypothetically, since Butch Davis was never mentioned in the NoA, linking the head coach to the program could somehow prove that UNC was dirtier than they seemed.  (Understand this is an approximate and over-simplified view of what the 216 records could do.)

There is on glaring problem with this aggressive push for the 216 records by the blogosphere and media, alike.  Hypothetically, let’s say we get the records.  Then what?  What happens when we have proof in front of God, the public, and everyone in between that Butch Davis was a horrible person and did bad things while occupying a position as UNC’s head football coach?

Well, of course some competent organization will meet to discuss…….. oh shit, it’s another BOGSAAT.

The fact of the matter is that the powers-that-be have shown that the greatest level of progress they can make towards bringing UNC to justice is sitting around and talking about it.  (Why this is still a shock to a blogosphere so consumed with their own influence is beyond me.)  UNC has always been dirty.  It’s their identity.  They didn’t get to where they are today by having active organizations watch-dogging their every move.  If we get the 216 records, I would bet a steak dinner on it amounting to more round-table discussions with little-to-no action.  Remember, a 9-month study into the African American Studies department concluded that 59 student, in 9 courses, were caught receiving grades they didn’t earn, including several athletes.  That study, which provided hard proof of athletes not earning grades, produced no reprecussions on the athletic department.  At the end of the day, it would appear the 216 records will become another news story that a BOGSAAT will get together and discuss with no action taken.

This brings NC State fans to one final question…

WHERE DOES “INVESTIGATING THE TRUTH” BECOME COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE

I was as pissed off at Lee Fowler as anyone when he referred to some in our fanbase as the “lunatic fringe”, but what happens when he’s actually *gulp* right?  If NC State and it’s media-underground can do something to sink the [flag]ship, or at least cripple it, then I think we have an obligation to do so.  After all, we are the literary foil to UNC’s perpetual shit.  That being said, when shit-talking for the sake of shit-talking turns into a “grassy knoll” or “birth certificate” type conspiracy, it’s time to step back from the forum for a second, go outside and breath some fresh air, and re-evaluate what we are trying to do and the benefit of our investigative labors.

What we don’t want to do is create an  NC State “birther” group that is spending more time focusing on the obvious; obvious in this case being how horrible of a place Carolina is.  At this point in time Carolina’s reputation has been damaged significantly and their athletic program has seen more turmoil than anyone can recall in their lives.  If you want to hang the “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED” banner, that might be appropriate.  What you don’t want to do is keep clinging to the remnants of a banner that isn’t going to amount to much.

The bottom line is this: will releasing the 216 records spurn actual change and further punishment for UNC?  If so, then go for it.  If it’s just digging up more shit on Carolina for the sake of digging up shit on Carolina, maybe it’s time we ease off the throttle before we prove a nasty stereotype correct.  I hate Carolina as much (or more) than the next guy, but the affects of the BOGSAAT are strong on the disciplinary process and their ability to do nothing is well documented.  If the 216 records are going to fall into the hands of another BOGSAAT, then keeping up with the headlines may not be worth the effort.

Breaking Down Yow’s 2012-2017 Strategic Plan

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : July 3, 2012
0

Category: Academics, Administration, Athletics, Slider

Tags:5-Year Plan, Athletic Department, Debbie Yow, NC State, Strategic Plan

Yesterday, Debbie Yow released NC State’s 5-year strategic plan for athletics.  Emblazoned on the front cover is her theme “WOLFPACK UNLIMITED” with a subtitle reading “Refuse To Accept The Status Quo”.  This represents everything NC State fans worldwide have come to love about Yow’s brief tenure.

If you have time to read the 29 page strategic plan document, awesome.  If not, here is an under-1500 word summary of all that you need to know.  If you’re only interested in certain goals, just scroll down to the bolded heading that interests you.  Enjoy!

NC_State_strategic_plan

INTRODUCTORY NOTES

It’s a 29 page document outlining what Debbie Yow envisions for NC State.  First and foremost is Yow’s “Core Areas”, which she has established committees to address.
1) Strategic Planning Steering Committee
2) Student-Athlete Academic Performance, Personal Development and Well-Being Committee
3) Competitive Excellence Committee
4) Branding, Marketing, Partnerships and Development Committee
5) Facility Enhancement Committee
6) Financial Stability Committee
7) Compliance Education and Culture

There is a lot of good stuff in there, but we can make special note of both Competitive Excellence and Branding, which both lagged terribly under Fowler, and the Compliance Education and Culture Committee which shows a dedication to ensuring that NC State doesn’t end up like Carolina.

Each athletic program, administrative unit, and student-athlete group had to complete a series of self-evaluations and openly state what their goal statements were.  This is important because it’s going to force athletic programs to acknowledge where they have lagged behind and what they plan on doing about it.  If they don’t improve, it gives Yow the ability to help them improve (what that means, exactly, is to be seen).

OUR MISSION (Page 5)

NC State’s Athletic Department’s mission is founded in 7 core principles, the first two probably being the most apt given NC State’s concern of results and the ongoing mess “across the hill” which could easily suck-up other institutions:
1) Achieve [national recognition]
2) Graduate
3) Cultivate [and environment]
4) Allocate [funds]
5) Recruit
6) Generate [funds]
7) Create [branding]

It is calming to see funding turn up several times, especially given the financial state that Maryland was left in shortly after Yow’s departure from their program.  While not directly attributed to Yow, many have rumored that she poorly managed the finances of UMd’s program.

GOAL 1: ACHIEVE (Page 7)

Several days ago, NC State was given some outstanding news when it was announced that NC State finished 37th, overall, in last year’s director’s cup.  The outstanding performance of our basketball and baseball teams, as well as the 8-win finish for football undoubtedly contributed, as well as the myriad of non-revenue golf, track & field, and swimming achievements.  Yow is using the director’s cup as one metric to determine where the program stands nationally.  Beginning in 2013, her plan is to be “65th or better”.  That number will move up the rankings to “25th or better” by 2017.  Other ACC schools in the top 25 this year include Florida State (5th), UNC (8th), Virginia (15th), and Duke (16th).

Furthermore, Yow has established three requirements to ensure we have quality staff: 1) Offer competitive compensation packages to quality coaches, 2) document and track staff superlatives to encourage achievement and 3) organize three department-wide events for all staff to solidify the winning environment.

GOAL 2: GRADUATE (Page 11)

As hard as I am on Tom O’Brien, this is an area where he is already addressing many key strategies for building a successful program.  The first sub-goal reads as follows:

Ensure all sports programs are signing student-athletes with superior athletic talent, admirable character, excellent work ethic, and a personal commitment to academic achievement.

 (As a side-note… I miss Russell Wilson.)

Much of the rest of Goal 2 is “motherhood and apple pie”, but I did find it interesting that a focus is placed on transitioning students from high school to college.  To me, this may be the most important aspect of developing positive student-athletes who, in some instances, are coming out of schools who did not expect academic rigor from their performance.  If we can let our recruits know up-front what is expected from them, we shouldn’t have as many problems.

GOAL 3: CULTIVATE (Page 13)

Again, there is a lot of “motherhood and apple pie” involved in following the rules and achieving within the construct of the NCAA and ACC, but this is interesting…

Encourage a culture of compliance that results in the administration, coaches, staff, student-athletes and boosters following the letter and spirit of NCAA and ACC rules and asking questions before acting.

This is due-diligence at it’s finest.  It’s not so much of a poke-in-the-eye of UNC as much as it is publicly stating that NC State is doing everything it can to make sure we have learned from the mistakes of other and from our own past.  Many of us either remember or can recall the damning judgement coming down on NC State from the Poole Commission stating that NC State hadn’t violated the letter of the rules, but have violated the “spirit” of the rules.

It’s also worth noting that this is where Yow addresses Title IX compliance.

GOAL 4: ALLOCATE (Page 16)

One thing Fowler did well (I didn’t say “correctly”) was balance a budget.  He could solicit for funds and avoid spending.  When you aren’t using any money, it’s easy to not go into debt.  Yow is taking a different approach of developing the budget, track spending, then communicate the need for more funds from donors and from ticket sales.

Ticket sales are particularly interesting because attendance is about so much more than revenue; it’s about branding (which we’ll get into).  Take a look at this screen-shot…

A goal isn’t useful unless it’s measurable.  Yow has provided NC State with concrete goals on what to work towards.  This is useful for her subordinates in understanding how they will be evaluated and useful to the fan base so we can know whether she is “living up to expectations”.

Another aspect of the strategic plan we see already implemented is the use of contracts to bring in further revenue, as evidenced by the recent exclusivity deal signed with Adidas worth $7 million over the next 4 years.  Similar to Yow’s benchmarks for director’s cup success, she’s already exceeding expectations.

GOAL 5: RECRUIT (Page 20)

Recruiting isn’t just about student-athletes; it’s about coaches to.  In fact, two of the four sub-goals identified are specifically directed at coaches and staff.  The last of the four is specifically directed at allowing NC State’s Sports Management majors to work with the athletic department in an effort to (a) give the student population hands-on training for their post-graduate careers and (b) to increase the bonds between the academic university and the athletic department.

This is a genius idea for so many different reasons.  As mentioned, it aids current NC State students (not necessarily athletes) and helps the academic and athletic fiefdoms get together in the same room, but it’s also a shameless source of cheap labor.  Before anyone poo-poos this idea, consider that NC State on a regular basis hires “research assistants” at a bargain that helps the university accomplish ground-breaking research and benefits students in their studies and finances.  Why isn’t the same model being followed with the athletic department?  Genius.

GOAL 6: GENERATE (Page 23)

In 2010, Chancellor Woodson stated his core objectives at NC State which included growing the endowment.  Debbie Yow is moving in lock-step by establishing endowment goals and plans to expand the Wolfpack Club, the life-blood of our athletic fund-raising effort.  Tentatively, Yow wants to grow the Wolfpack Club and Student Wolfpack Club by 10% annually.

GOAL 7: BRANDING (Page 25)

In a state where most yokels recognize themselves as “Tar Heels” and every state-run organization clings stubbornly to the powder-your-ass blue that Carolina dawns, branding is harder than it should be.  After all, as we’ve written about extensively here at WolfpackWorld.com, NC State is the university “for the people” in North Carolina… not UNC.

The primary thrust of NC State’s branding strategy is to dominate the media market.  Better utilizing things such as radio and advertising can be useful in increasing recognition of what NC State stands for… and not just talking about the quality of mature women in the areas. 

The other two significant aspects of branding include improving gameday experience (a long-time complaint of many students and alumni), and increasing ties with former student-athletes.  Again, we’ve already made some immediate moves in the right direction as evident through Yow’s response to legends Corchiani and Gugliotta being ejected from the RBC Center.

CLOSING THOUGHTS

For those who made it through the article, I’ll keep it brief: NC State is heading towards a bright future with competent leadership at the helm.  What Debbie Yow excels in is understanding the business of running a department, having the capability to increase NC State’s athletic success, and understanding our tradition and history.  I actually don’t believe Yow is concerned with the demands of rabid fans per se, but I do think she sees fans as a valuable asset for raising funds and achieving the goals that she needs.  It’s a “I need you – you need me” relationship which is a healthy one.

If nothing else, this document is a line in the sand establishing what is and is not acceptable for NC State.  I’m looking forward to the future and what it holds for the next generation of State fans.

Fmr Chancellor Oblinger Out at Research Campus

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : June 29, 2012
0

Category: Academics, Administration, Slider

According to the Charlotte Business Journal, James Oblinger is out as president of the NC Research Campus in Kannapolis, NC.  He accepted the position of president last September and is already calling it quits.

To some, Oblinger represented mediocrity and inaction.  To others, Oblinger’s tenure at NC State represented everything that had gone wrong at NC A&M State College.  When Marye Ann Fox left NC State, many realized that she had frequently butted heads with the traditional power-structure within the state which resulted in the hiring of an individual that was completely complacent with the Good-Ole-Boys network of NC politics: James Oblinger.

James, for the most part, sat idly by while the University spun into further disrepair.  The same faculty ran things the same way using the same policies in an ever-changing climate of research, academics, and finances.  The old adage “adapt or die” comes to mind.  The biggest move that Oblinger made was compensating Provost Nielson handsomely for hiring former Governor Easley’s wife and giving her a subsequent 88% pay raise.

Unlike Carolina, NC State can get away with shit like this.  The scandal got so bad that the FBI decided to get involved.

We fired Oblinger (actually, we didn’t fire anyone… they all “resigned”) and he found refuge in the NC Research Campus in Kannapolis, NC working with horticulture or some stupid thing.

In September, the NC Research Campus made the same mistake that NC State did by hiring him as their president.  Fortunately, he wasn’t around long enough to embarrass the small institution.  Thus ends the journey of a man that epitomizes modern indifference to NC State’s fall from prominence.

Special thanks to interim Chancellor Woodward and Chancellor Woodson.  Damn, you guys sure had a big mess to clean up.

Biowarfare and Biodefense

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : June 25, 2012
0

Category: Academics, Industry, Slider

Yeah, I bet that title got your attention.

NC State is pairing up with Duke to do some pretty interesting research.  The Department of Health and Human Services is funding an effort between the two nationally renowned universities to look into how to defend against pandemics and bio-attacks.  A focus will be placed on rapid-dissemination techniques for quick response to potential threats to public health.

According to US New & World Report, NC State’s biological and agricultural engineering programs rank 10th in the country and 35th overall in graduate biomedical engineering.

In 2009, the White House released a new strategy for dealing with biological threats.  In the opening preface, President Obama said the following…

We will continue to face new and emerging biological threats that will require the coordinated and concerted efforts of a broad range of domestic and international partners. As we take action to counter these threats, we will work together to advance our own health security and provide for the improved condition of all humanity.

It took 3 years, but NC State is finally going to be funded to work on developing techniques to deal with such threats.

Going back to my article last week on rebranding North Carolina based on the merit of our purpose, this type of research goes a long way into proving real-world results of the tax payer’s investment in our institution and our students.  Speaking of students, this is also the type of real-world application that research assistants and current students can use to make themselves for marketable to the industry.  No one knows what the future economy will hold, but the greater our students’ ability to show how their studies relate to whats going on in our world today, the better off they’ll be.

This is important for NC State in rebuilding an image of excellence and important for the state politically and economically.  NC State is leading the UNC School System in innovation, but innovation without practicality is useless.  Good to see the Wolfpack on the hunt for a greater impact on our world.

NC State Does NC (and the UNC School System) A Favor By Posting Billboards

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Posted by :WolfpackWorld On : June 21, 2012
2

Category: Academics, Administration, Athletics, Slider

North Carolina State University is the land-grant university of North Carolina and is home to just under 35,000 students.  The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is home to under 30,000 students and represents the more liberal fields of study in academics.  The latter was established as a means to educate the social elite and well-to-do.  The former was established to aid the people of North Carolina by further developing the state’s economy and educating the masses in the agricultural and scientific arts.  NC State has long since been producing patent after patent and study after study aimed at supporting the populous and regional economy while UNC has focused on their more abstract curriculum.

And then, of course, there is the matter of academic integrity, all of which UNC has lost due to the recently acknowledgement by the mass media of Carolina’s sub-standard classroom governance.  Maybe citizens in North Carolina can argue about which university is their favorite to root for on gameday, but when it comes to which institution stands, studies, and fights for them, there should be no doubt.

THE CAROLINA WAY

When Carolina broke news about ‘potential irregularities’ in their African-American Studies department, many in Wolfpack World already knew what was going.  AfAm Studies had become the proverbial ‘Bachelors in Athletics’ degree from Carolina for many star players.  It was doom for the athletics department and their academic reputation.

What is deplorable is what Carolina openly confessed to not catching sooner…

That report, spanning summer school 2007 through summer school 2011, found evidence of serious and fraudulent irregularities in more than 50 classes.

Problems included poor oversight, unauthorized graded changes and possible forgery of professors’ signatures on grade rolls.

In high school, I can recall football players being caught ineligible for failing a single class or having sub-standard marks on their tests resulting in teams having to forfeit a game.  Bear in mind those are high schools catching a single athlete missing satisfactory grades from a single class.  What Carolina did was shove a massive number of athletes through an entire fucking academic program and not catch it for upwards of 4 years. 

How does this happen?  It happens when you have a university that has completely lost touch of their fundamental purpose of existence as a public university and develops their own sense of purpose and contrives their own moral and ethical code for administrative conduct.  Turning a blind-eye to unethical programs is acceptable as long as it’s all in the name of the “greater good” of protecting The Flagship.

That’s The Carolina Way, my friends.

GREAT DISGRACE LEADS TO A MASSIVE REBRANDING EFFORT

When I graduated and initially began applying for jobs at career fairs, I remember recruiters seeing the block ‘S’ on my shirt and asking if I went to Stanford.  Others, when they heard I came from North Carolina, asked if I attended UNC.  Like it or not, State fans, UNC represents higher education in North Carolina to the uneducated masses.  You say “College” and “North Carolina” and they think “oh, you mean that powder-blue school”.  UNC is branded with North Carolina.

This is why NC State’s billboard effort is something I welcomed when I first noticed an advertisement off I-95 as I traveled from DC back to North Carolina.  Yes, it was a nice stab at UNC as our athletic rivals, but it also emphasized that public perception of higher education in North Carolina needs to acknowledge that NC State University is, indeed, that state’s true flagship.  It produces numerous patents each year, attracts industry and innovation into a troubled economy, introduces technologies and break-throughs that increase industry profitability within the state, and gives North Carolinians a team to root for that allows you to wear masculine colors that won’t get you beat-up in grade school (seriously, Tar Heels, at least we changed our “girly colors” a hundred years ago… what’s your excuse?).

The state of North Carolina needs this branding effort.  They need to understand that the cesspool of corruption that exists over-the-hill is “just another university” in the UNC School System.  If this state is going to be proud of their higher education, they can’t continue to latch onto an institution that plays by their own rules and gives it a cute little name like “The Carolina Way”. 

This is OUR [NC] STATE and I’m proud to be from it.

 

Page 1 of 3123»

Be A Fan On Facebook

Follow Us On Twitter

  • Rss

Polls

Are you satisfied with the hoops season?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

@Wolfpack_World on Twitter

RT @CoachRNielsen Champions are built today...Not tomorrow!

— WolfpackWorld.com (@Wolfpack_World) May 20, 2013

RT @coachfaulk Hard work equals wins. First day of summer workouts for the team. Time to grind. #1Pack1Goal

— WolfpackWorld.com (@Wolfpack_World) May 20, 2013

I wonder if anyone's tried recreating State's campus in Minecraft...

— WolfpackWorld.com (@Wolfpack_World) May 18, 2013

Friend: "Battlestar Galactica and Minecraft? Such a nerd." Me: "F*** you. I have a wife, house, job and hobbies. I've already overachieved."

— WolfpackWorld.com (@Wolfpack_World) May 18, 2013

RT @NCSUMicMan @NCStateBaseball ACC scenarios: Pack W & Clem W=2 seed, Pack W & FSU W=4 seed, Pack L & FSU W=4 seed, Pack L & Clem W=5 seed.

— WolfpackWorld.com (@Wolfpack_World) May 18, 2013

Latest Blog Comments

  • WolfpackWorld on Kids These Days Writing About “Mediocrity”
  • Not A Fan of Blue on Kids These Days Writing About “Mediocrity”
  • WolfpackWorld on Jason Collins: A Study on The Individual vs The Team
  • Chad on Jason Collins: A Study on The Individual vs The Team
  • Ken Babb on Jason Collins: A Study on The Individual vs The Team
  • Ken Babb on Jason Collins: A Study on The Individual vs The Team
  • Ken Babb on Jason Collins: A Study on The Individual vs The Team
  • WolfpackWorld on Jason Collins: A Study on The Individual vs The Team
  • Ken Babb on Jason Collins: A Study on The Individual vs The Team
  • WolfpackWorld on Jason Collins: A Study on The Individual vs The Team

Past Articles

  • Athletics (134)
    • Basketball (59)
    • Conference (15)
    • Football (47)
    • Non-Revenue (1)
  • Blog Stuff (209)
    • Blog News (15)
    • Slider (198)
    • Video (10)
  • Non-Athletic (69)
    • Academics (26)
    • Administration (20)
    • Alumni (9)
    • Around Campus (24)
    • Industry (15)

Register/Login

  • Register
  • Log in

Archives

  • May 2013 (2)
  • April 2013 (7)
  • March 2013 (10)
  • February 2013 (10)
  • January 2013 (20)
  • December 2012 (9)
  • November 2012 (14)
  • October 2012 (12)
  • September 2012 (4)
  • August 2012 (14)
  • July 2012 (21)
  • June 2012 (26)
  • May 2012 (30)
  • April 2012 (23)
  • March 2012 (8)

The Buzz

2011 2012 2012-2013 ACC basketball Boston College Carolina Cavaliers Chuck Amato Clemson Dave Doeren Debbie Yow Demon Deacons Duke Eagles Expectations Football Gottfried Herb Sendek Hoops Lorenzo Brown Mark Gottfried Maryland Miami NCAA NCAA Tournament NC State officials officiating Preview Richard Howell Tar Heels Tennessee Tigers TJ Warren Tom O'Brien Tyler Lewis UConn UNC UVa Virginia Virginia Tech Wahoos Wake Forest Wolfpack

Who We Are

WolfpackWorld is created by an alumni of NC State University to talk about sports, campus events, and anything else affecting the university. We believe that sharing your opinions about NC State shouldn't be something that you have to be a web-genius or a member of some inside "old boys club" to enjoy. Good opinions also shouldn't be buried in the usual muck of online forums and web-communities. At WolfpackWorld, we believe being a fan is a part of who we are.

We openly invite anyone to submit material for public or private publishing. We have, and will, publish material from individuals under pseudo-names or under the WolfpackWorld handle. If you would like to contribute to our content, please visit our feedback form and let us know what's on your mind!

© All rights reserved.
Designed by ThemeAlley.Com